I knew there was a reason I switched to MSN Search instead of Google. Not only because the Microsoft Research Center, one of the most heavily funded computer science research centers in the WORLD, helped the MSN group with a new, re-tooled version of MSN Search, but because I'm sick and tired of throwing my money at Leftists like those at Google who take my money and then thumb their noses at me.
Little Green Footballs relays the scoop on the most recent display of Google bias. Seems that Rightmarch.com conducted an experiment to see if they could draw out the bias that has evidenced itself before at Google. In a nutshell, they took an anti-Tom Delay ad that is running on Google and substituted the name Pelosi (D-California). When they applied to run the ad, Google rejected the ad with the explanation,
Google policy does not permit ad text that advocates against an individual, group or organization.
Michelle Malkin has previously noted a USA Today article that shows Google staff run overwhelmingly Democrat in their political tastes if you can judge by the fact that 98% of their private political contributions went to Democrats in the 2004 elections. (An interesting irony, by the way, is that they are supporting the very party that is most likely to push to tax the Internet, the lifespring of the search engine giant.)
I suppose the Google Ad staff need to read their own code which reads:
The core message is simple: Being Googlers means striving toward the highest possible standard of ethical business conduct. This is a matter as much practical as ethical; we hire great people who work hard to build great products, but our most important asset by far is our reputation as a company that warrants our users' faith and trust. That trust is the foundation upon which our success and prosperity rests, and it must be re-earned every day, in every way, by every one of us.
Unless you're a Republican/Conservative. Then we don't want your trust or your business.
Recent Comments